EDUC 5410 - Defining Purpose continued …
After a brief
discussion with David today, it became clear that the answers I had initially
given to questions 1 and 2 were more research based than assessment based. The next challenge I had was to craft a way
to approach faith-based schooling not so much on a philosophical level but
rather in a way that would look at the results of this type of schooling. Though I am not nearly confident that I am on
the right track, I believe I am more so than I was before this morning’s class.
I believe I
have successfully changed number one, although I still may revise this before
the weekend is over. I am also much
happier with number two although I am still unclear what the constructs for
number one should be. The question I
currently have is have I written four constructs already for number two and am scratching
my head for nothing, or am I still out in left field on what a construct
is? And if I am, can I get an example of
what a construct for my chosen topic is? (Please?)
Heuristic questions revised:
1. What are the information needs about
students, teachers, or administrators that you need to fill?
- · What are the indicators demonstrating that students who attend various Christian schools benefit from a faith-infused curriculum?
2. What do you want to know?
- · To what extent does faith manifest itself as a result of the learned curriculum?
o
How
do students, as a result of learning from a Christian worldview, articulate
that worldview?
o
Are
students able to interpret their faith-based learning to make it personal and
long lasting?
o
Do
students show empathy for, and understand, perspectives other than their own?
o
Are
students able to apply their faith-based learning to diverse contexts in their
lives?
EDUC 5400
Now that our
groups are set for the presentation, and our topic has been chosen, I am
excited to explore the method of phenomenology.
As a Social Studies person and a storyteller, I am always interested in
the human experience, particularly when it is firsthand. While I know that if I were to use this
methodology myself in my future research, I would be very good at summarizing
people’s stories. The challenge that I
believe exists in this sort of methodology is how does one remain 100% neutral
or detached from the stories one is being told?
If the results are to be unbiased, and assuming the researcher has some
type of personal connection to the topic (otherwise why would he/she want to
study it?), this would be challenging indeed.
It makes me wonder if the type of methodology that one uses to research
should be carefully chosen depending upon one’s emotional attachment to the
topic?
Great questions you ask about the methodology. Should you be emotionally attached to your topic? Or is that the only way to conduct research - is to be attached? Great things to be struggling with.
ReplyDelete